首页> 外文OA文献 >Best practice when service users do not consent to sharing information with carers - National multimethod study
【2h】

Best practice when service users do not consent to sharing information with carers - National multimethod study

机译:服务使用者不同意与护理人员共享信息的最佳实践-国家多方法研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Background Service users with psychosis may not consent to sharing information with carers. However, carers require access to relevant information to support them in their role. Aims To inform clinical practice when service users withhold consent to share information with their carer. Method Study data were derived from a synthesis of policy review (n=91), national survey (n=595) and individual interviews (n=24). Results Key principles to guide information-sharing practices were identified. Service users highlighted confidentiality being guaranteed by consent processes. Carers suggested a 'culture shift' was required, with professionals trained to work with carers. Professionals emphasised mental capacity, professional judgement and the context of care. A best practice framework is proposed. Conclusions An important distinction is between general information, which can always be shared without consent, and personal information, which is new to the carer and where consent needs to be considered. Clinical judgement is central to balancing conflicting ethical imperatives in this area. Declaration of interest None
机译:背景患有精神病的服务用户可能不同意与护理人员共享信息。但是,护理人员需要访问相关信息以支持他们的角色。目的是在服务使用者未同意与护理人员共享信息时告知临床实践。方法研究数据来自政策审查(n = 91),国家调查(n = 595)和个人访谈(n = 24)的综合。结果确定了指导信息共享实践的关键原则。服务用户强调保密是通过同意流程来保证的。护老者建议进行“文化转变”,培训专业人员以与护老者一起工作。专业人士强调心理能力,专业判断力和照护环境。提出了最佳实践框架。结论一个重要的区别是,一般信息和个人信息之间是很重要的区别,一般信息可以在未经同意的情况下共享,而个人信息对于护理人员来说是新的,需要考虑同意。临床判断对于平衡该领域相互冲突的道德要求至关重要。申报利益无

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号